The following assumptions for load combinations in foundation design have been adopted:
If one limit state condition of the same impact yields simultaneously favorable and unfavorable effects, then the effects of this impact are given simultaneously the same factor. Such an assumption results in the load of a given condition being smaller (favorable) or greater (unfavorable) than the assumed condition.
Adoption of the following two assumptions indicates that for a given state it is possible to assume one safety factor for backfill loads as well as for the weight of the soil and a foundation. The maximal or minimal factor depends on the effect of these impacts in an analyzed state. For the available codes the following effect of impacts and the corresponding load factors have been adopted.
Impact Limite state |
Foundation weight |
Soil weight |
Dead load on the backfill |
Live load on the backfill |
Ground water |
Capacity of the soil |
maximal |
maximal |
maximal |
maximal |
minimal |
Sliding |
minimal |
minimal |
minimal |
0.0 |
maximal |
Rotation |
minimal |
minimal |
minimal |
0.0 |
maximal |
Position of a force resultant |
minimal |
minimal |
minimal |
0.0 |
maximal |
Lifting |
minimal |
minimal |
minimal |
0.0 |
maximal |
Average settlement |
maximal |
maximal |
maximal |
maximal |
minimal |
Settlement diffrence |
maximal |
maximal |
maximal |
maximal |
minimal |
Regulations of code combinations (*.rgl files) are linked permanently to the geotechnical design codes:
Both the regulation provided factors and the rules describing combination generation are user-defined.
In the regulations are the following designations of load subnatures that enable differentiation of the safety factors for the soil weight, backfill loads, foundation self-weight and the Archimedes pressure.
In the default regulations it has been assumed that factors of subnatures correspond to the natures to which the loads have been assigned.
For ENV 1997-1:1994 (EC 7) code, the table below presents the combination types available in the regulations as well as the impact types with their partial safety factors:
Combinations |
Impacts |
|||
dead |
live - favorable |
accidental - unfavorable |
||
favorable |
unfavorable |
|||
ULS A |
[1.0] |
[0.95] |
[1.5] |
- |
ULS B |
[1.35] |
[1.0] |
[1.5] |
- |
ULS C |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
1.3] |
- |
SLS |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
- |
ALS |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
For ENV 1997-1:2004 (EC 7) code, the table below presents the combination types available in the regulations as well as the impact types with their partial safety factors:
Combinations |
Impacts |
|||
dead |
live - favorable |
accidental - unfavorable |
||
favorable |
unfavorable |
|||
ULS A1 |
[1.0] |
[1.35] |
[1.5] |
- |
ULS A2 |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
1.3] |
- |
SLS |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
- |
ALS |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |
[1.0] |