Remove rigid body modes can be used when either of the following conditions are true:
The model is fully unconstrained
That is, you have not applied any X, Y, or Z constraints to any portion of the model. When the model is fully unconstrained, applied loads can be balanced or unbalanced.
The model is constrained,
Table 1: When to activate Remove rigid body modes.
Is the model constrained? | Are forces balanced in the constrained directions? | Does the sum of the moments = 0? | Can you use Remove rigid body modes? |
---|---|---|---|
No | -- | -- | Yes |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Yes | Yes | No | No |
Yes | No | No | No |
Assume that a model is constrained against movement in the vertical direction. A force of 100 N is applied in that direction. The model must have an opposing force of 100 N in the opposite direction so that the sum of forces in the vertical direction is zero. Loads acting in unconstrained directions may be balanced or unbalanced.
Remove rigid body mode not enabled, showing correct deflection | Remove rigid body mode enabled, showing incorrect deflection |
Because the moments due to the forces do not equal 0, the results are wrong when Remove rigid body mode is enabled. Notice that the reaction moment is zero, due to the solver adding a rotional acceleration to counteract the unbalanced moment.
Assume that a model is constrained against movement in the vertical direction, with a force of 100 N applied in opposing directions. (One force of 100 N pointing up, and two forces of 50 N each pointing down.) Because of the equal spacing in this example, the moment due to the three loads equals zero. The remove rigid body modes option can be used in this example if necessary.
Remove rigid body mode not enabled, showing correct deflection. | Remove rigid body mode enabled, showing correct deflection |
When using Remove rigid body mode with an unconstrained model, it is still important to consider whether you must balance the applied loads to achieve accurate results. Examples 3 and 4 demonstrate two situations. One scenario produces good results with an unbalanced load. For the other scenario, you need to balance the loads to achieve accurate results.
This example is a simply-supported square bar with a uniformly distributed force (F) applied to the full length of the bar. The reaction at each end is (F + W) / 2, where W is the weight of the bar itself. You can apply only the reaction forces to the ends of the bar (red arrows). The acceleration applied by the solver produces a force (Fa) equal to F + W (blue arrows). A portion of this acceleration force acts on every element in the model. The resultant counterforce to the applied load is distributed uniformly along the full length of the model.
Alternatively, if you perform the following two actions:
Then, the result is identical to the fully unconstrained case. The solver only has to apply a very small acceleration to counter the small mathematical imbalances resulting from the FEA method.
In this example, you apply balanced loads to the model, which theoretically provide an equilibrium condition. The solver applies a very small amount of global acceleration, just enough to counter the slight mathematical imbalance introduced by the FEA method.
Apply a large force (F, the middle red arrow), concentrated at the center of the span. Activate gravity to produce the weight load (W, the green arrows). Finally, apply the calculated reaction forces to the ends of the bar (the outer two red arrows). When a load acts at a point, edge, or small area of a part, the solver cannot accurately represent it by applying global acceleration. The distributed force from global acceleration and a concentrated force at midspan do not produce the same stress or displacement results.