Tetrahedral elements are 4- or 10-node isoparametric or sub-parametric curvilinear tetrahedra. Figure 1 illustrates some typical elements. Figure 2 shows an example of a tetrahedral element.
Figure 1: A Typical Tetrahedral Element
Figure 2: A Typical Application for a Tetrahedral Element
Determination of Surface Number for Tetrahedral Elements
When applying loads to a surface number of a tetrahedral part, be aware that some models may not have all the lines on the face to be loaded on the same surface number. What happens in this situation? If the model originated from a CAD solid model, all faces coincident with the surface of the CAD model will receive the load regardless of the surface number of the lines. In hand-built models and on CAD parts that are altered so that the part is no longer associated with the CAD part, the surface number that is common in any two of the three lines that define a face determines the surface number of that face.
First, you must specify the material model for this part in the Material Model list box under the Element Definition dialog. The available material models are grouped in the following categories. Refer to the appropriate page under the Material Properties page for details on each of the material models.
For the tetrahedral elements in this part to have the midside nodes activated, select the Included option in the Midside Nodes drop-down box. If this option is selected, the tetrahedral elements will have additional nodes defined at the midpoints of each edge. (For meshes of CAD solid models, the midside nodes follow the original curvature of the CAD surface, depending on the option selected before creating the mesh. For hand-built models and CAD model meshes that are altered, the midside node is located at the midpoint between the corner nodes.) This will change a 4-node tetrahedral element into a 10-node tetrahedral element. An element with midside nodes will result in more accurately calculated gradients. This is especially useful when trying to model bending behavior with few elements across the bending plane. Elements with midside nodes increase processing time. If the mesh is sufficiently small, then midside nodes may not provide any significant increase in accuracy.
Use the Analysis Type drop-down to set the type of displacement that is expected. Small Displacement is appropriate for parts that experience no motion and only small strains and will ignore nonlinear geometric effects that result from large deformation. (It also sets the Analysis Formulation on the Advanced tab to Material Nonlinear Only.) Large Displacement is appropriate for parts that experience motion and/or large strains. (The Analysis Formulation on the Advanced tab should also be set as required for the analysis.)
If a tetrahedral element part is using a material model that includes thermal effects, you must specify a value in the Stress free reference temperature field in the Thermal tab of the Element Definition dialog. This value is used as the reference temperature to calculate element-based loads associated with constraint of thermal growth using bilinear interpolation of the nodal temperatures.
If a tetrahedral element part is using a material model that includes creep, select the option in the Creep law drop-down box. This selection will be used to calculate the creep effects during the analysis. The creep laws available are as follows:
where is the effective creep strain rate and
is the effect stress. Also refer to the page Setting Up and Performing the Analysis: Nonlinear: Material Properties: Thermal Creep Viscoelastic Material Properties for important information on entering the material properties.
For the creep calculations to be calculated on evenly sized divisions of the time step, select the Fixed substeps option in the Time integration method drop-down box. For the creep calculations to be calculated on variable sized divisions of the time step, select the Flexible substeps option. These two methods are based on time hardening and use explicit time integration methods. These methods may become unstable under some loading conditions. When using the Thermal Viscoelastic Creep material model and the Creep strain definition drop-down box is not set to Modified, an additional option will be available in the Time integration method drop-down box: the Alpha-method. This method uses an implicit time integration scheme to improve the creep behavior. This method can be unconditionally stable.
Specify the temperature at which no thermal stress exists in the Stress free reference temperature field.
If you are performing an analysis with non-cyclical loading, select the Effective option in the Creep strain definition drop-down box. If you are performing an analysis with cyclical loading, select the Modified option.
During the analysis, the creep calculations will be performed as iterations in substeps of each time step. You can control how many substeps are allowed in a single time step in the Maximum number of substeps field. You can also specify how many iterations can be performed in a single substep in the Maximum number of iterations in a substep field. After each substep iteration, the creep stress and strain will be compared to the previous iteration. If the value is not within the tolerances specified in the Creep strain calculation tolerance and Creep stress calculation tolerance fields, another iteration will be required.
When using a Time integration method of Alpha-method, the Time integration parameter needs to be specified. To use a fully explicit method for the time-integration scheme (but different than the fixed/flexible substeps' explicit method), type 0.0 in the Time integration parameter field. To use a fully implicit method, type 1.0 in the Time integration parameter field. When the Time integration parameter is greater than 0.5, this method is unconditionally stable.
If this part of tetrahedral elements is using an orthotropic material model, you will need to define the orientation of material axes 1, 2 and 3 in the Orthotropic tab of the Element Definition dialog. There are two basic methods to accomplish this.
Method 1:
The first method is to select one of the global axes as material axis 1. If you select the Global X-direction option in the Material axis direction specified using drop-down box, the orthogonal material axes follow the X, Y and Z axes as follows:
If you select the Global Y-direction option in the Material axis direction specified using drop-down box, the orthogonal material axes follow the X, Y and Z axes as follows:
If you select the Global Z-direction option in the Material axis direction specified using drop-down box, the orthogonal material axes follow the X, Y and Z axes as follows:
With the first method, the axes can be rotated about the chosen global direction by entering an angle in the Material Axis Rotation Angle field. This angle follows the right-hand rule.
Method 2:
The second method is to select the Spatial Points option in the Material axis direction specified using drop-down menu. Next you must define the coordinates for three spatial points in the Spatial point coordinates table. Next, select the appropriate index for the spatial points in the Index of spatial point 1, Index of spatial point 2, and Index of spatial point 3 drop-down menus.
Figure 3: Orientation of Material Axes
Analysis Formulation: Select the formulation method that you want to use for the tetrahedral elements in the Analysis Formulation drop-down box in the Advanced tab.
The Stress Update Method is used when the material model (on the General tab) is set to one of the following plastic material models:
This controls the numerical algorithm for integrating the constitutive equations (stress/strain law) when the material goes plastic. The options available for the Stress Update Method are as follows:
Stress Update Method Guidelines:
In the Explicit integration scheme, the yield surface, plastic potential gradients, and hardening law are all evaluated at known stress states. No particular iteration is strictly necessary to predict the final stresses.
In the Generalized Mid-Point scheme (which is a type of implicit method), simple iterative adjustment restores the next increment's stresses and hardening parameters to the yield surface, since this condition is not enforced by the integration. This correction requires additional effort for solving the nonlinear equations iteratively. Conversely, explicit methods do not require the solution of a system of nonlinear equations to compute the stresses at each Gauss point.
The Parameter for Generalized Mid-point input is used when the Stress Update Method is set to Generalized Mid-Point. Acceptable ranges for this input are 0 to 1, inclusive. When the Parameter is set equal to 0, the resulting algorithm would be a fully explicit member of the algorithm family (similar to the Explicit option for the Stress Update Method); however, the solution is not unconditionally stable. When the Parameter is 0.5 or larger, the method is unconditionally stable. When the Parameter is set to 0.5, the solution is known as a mid-point algorithm; when it is 1, the solution is known as the fully backward Euler or closest point algorithm and is fully implicit. A value of 1 is more accurate than other values, especially for large time steps.
The Strain Measurements is used when the Material Model (on the General tab) is set to Isotropic and the Analysis Formulation is set to Updated Lagrangian. The options are used to improve the convergence of the updated Lagrangian method. The options available for the Strain Measurements are as follows:
If the Allow for overlapping elements check box is activated, overlapping elements will be allowed to be created when the lines are decoded into elements. Overlapping may be necessary when modeling elements. This is especially true for problems confined to planar motion.
For the stress results for each element to be written to the text log file at each time step during the analysis, activate the Detailed force and moment output check box. This may result in large amounts of output data.
If one of the von Mises material models has been selected, you can choose to have the current material state (elastic or plastic), current yield stress limit, current equivalent stress limit and equivalent plastic strain output at corner nodes and/or integration points at every time step. This is done by selecting the appropriate option in the Additional output drop-down box.
Many physical problems involve motions that essentially preserve volumes. Materials that behave in this fashion are termed incompressible. For example, rubber and metals with rigid-plastic flow are nearly incompressible. Activating the Selective Reduced Integration (Mean-dilatation) check box will add a modification to the usual compressible FEA formulations that represents the incompressible limit and high-compressible volume change. This method (B-Bar) helps avoid the volumetric locking.
When not activated (unchecked), the dilatational components of deformations (volume related) are integrated at the same order with the deviatoric components. When activated (checked), the mean value is used to compute the dilatational contribution.
Two examples in which this option will benefit the analysis are as follows:
To activate the Selective Reduced Integration (Mean-dilatation) check box, the Compatibility must be set to Enforced.
When one of the piezoelectric material models has been chosen for a part, two additional options will become available within the Advanced tab of the Element Definition dialog box...
If the Duncan-Chang material model is chosen, the Soil tab is enabled. Enter the following input as appropriate for the analysis. This input is related to the initial state of the soil; also see the page Setting Up and Performing the Analysis: Nonlinear: Material Properties: Duncan-Chang Material Properties: Duncan-Chang Theoretical Description for information.