Now, just as we did for the large-notch coupon, we'll examine SDV1 to evaluate the damage in the cruciform. We'll also be able to see how the elements are removed from our model as failure propagates.
Recall that SDV1 will range from 1.0 to 3.0 for woven materials, but the discrete values between 1.0 and 3.0 represent a different damage state. For additional information, refer to Appendix C.
Visually, we can clearly see the effect the element deletion has on this model. The removal of elements makes it very easy to identify failure.
If we were to plot a load-displacement curve for this cruciform specimen, we would see that the cases with and without element deletion have very similar responses. Since much of the failure in the cruciform occurs within a few increments, this should not surprise us.
When we have a model in which the damage propagates gradually over several increments we will see a larger discrepancy between the responses with and without the use of element deletion. In such a case, the results should appear to be more physically reasonable with element deletion activated. This is especially true for woven materials where it is harder to degrade the material to a very low stiffness. Recall, that until an element has been deleted, it will continue to contribute to the strain energy of the model, and as a result, influence the propagation of damage. This can lead to a larger post-failure stiffness than expected.