In this exercise, we will examine the results from the last exercise, and determine if the mesh distribution played too strong an influence on our results. We will do the following in this exercise:
Start Autodesk® Inventor, and open refine-mesh.ipt from the Section 8 - Refine Mesh sub-folder of your training exercises folder.
Start the Autodesk Nastran In-CAD environment.
To load the results needed for this exercise, click Load from the Results panel, and select Analysis1.FNO:
Upon close inspection, the stress results show a few indicators of potential convergence issues. The local face tangency is intermittent. In the following image, you can see that the results on the surface look "rough," and the area of high stress is "spotty."
We'll start by displaying von Mises stress on the model and adjusting the rendering options:
Note that the unaveraged centroidal plot shows large jumps in stress across adjacent elements. This is a clear indicator that mesh refinement is needed.
The original mesh is shown on the left, and the new one is on the right:
Click Run from the ribbon.
Note that the stress increased nearly 20% in this fillet:
Autodesk® Nastran® In-CAD provides powerful tools for mesh control and refinement to enable you to get the best mesh for your design needs.
Convergence should always be checked, even if you are focusing on trend analysis. If two designs are not similarly converged, you won't know if the stress change was due to design variations or is mesh related. This could lead to bad design decisions.
Previous Topic: Meshing |
Next Topic: Contact Modeling |