Weirs are used for overflow structures and for outlets to storage ponds. Weir controls have the same characteristics for flow in both directions.
A weir is represented as a link of zero length, forming a head-discharge relationship between two nodes. The boundary condition between the link and a node is that of equal water levels. The weir crest invert level determines when the control first comes into operation.
The weir types available in InfoWorks ICM are:
The discharge over the various kinds of weir is calculated using the equations below.
There are two flow conditions that are possible over weirs:
For free discharge InfoWorks ICM uses the governing model equation based on the Kindsvater and Carter equation:
|
where: Qo is the free outfall discharge Cd is the discharge coefficient g is the acceleration due to gravity B is the width of the weir Du is the upstream depth with respect to the crest |
For drowned discharge InfoWorks ICM uses the Kindsvater and Carter equation where Dd is greater than zero:
|
where: Dd is the downstream depth with respect to the crest |
See BS3680 (Part 4A) for more information.
If the Use Villemonte equation option has been chosen as a Simulation Parameter, when the weir is under drowned conditions, the Villemonte formula is used to modify the free outfall discharge as presented in the equation below:
|
where: Q is the discharge Qo is the free outfall discharge (calculated using the free discharge equation above) Dd is the downstream depth with respect to the crest Du is the upstream depth with respect to the crest |
If the water level exceeds the roof height then InfoWorks ICM will use the lower of the flow values calculated by using the weir equations above and the orifice formula.
For free discharge InfoWorks ICM uses the Kindsvater and Carter equation, in which a minimum value of critical depth over the weir crest is enforced, and the contracted width is assumed to extend up to the channel wall height.
|
where: Qo is the free outfall discharge Du is the upstream depth with respect to the crest p is the height of the weir crest above the channel invert B is the weir width g is the acceleration due to gravity |
For drowned discharge InfoWorks ICM uses the Kindsvater and Carter equation where Dd is greater than zero:
|
where: Dd is the downstream depth with respect to the crest |
The Villemonte formula is then used to modify the free outfall discharge. See Equation 3 above.
Under free discharge, InfoWorks ICM uses the equation:
|
where: Qo is the free outfall discharge B is the weir width at crest level Du is the upstream depth with respect to the crest |
The crest is the level at which the weir comes into operation - in other words the base of the trapezoidal notch(es).
The weir is assumed to be drowned if the downstream water level exceeds the crest level. The Villemonte formula is then used to modify the free outfall discharge. See Equation 3 above.
See BS3680 (Part 4A) for more information.
Under free discharge InfoWorks ICM uses the Kindsvater and Shen formula:
|
where: Qo is the free outfall discharge g is the acceleration due to gravity Cd is the discharge coefficient. In InfoWorks ICM, this value is fixed at 0.585. This is correct for 90° notch weirs. θ is the angle of the notch Du is the upstream depth with respect to the crest |
The weir is assumed to be drowned if the downstream water level exceeds the crest level. The Villemonte formula is then used to modify the free outfall discharge. See Equation 3 above.
See BS3680 (Part 4A) for more information.
InfoWorks ICM uses the standard formula for a round nosed broad crested weir:
|
where: Qo is the free outfall discharge Cd is the discharge coefficient. This is calculated using the formula below Cv is a dimensionless coefficient allowing for the effect of approach velocity B is the width of the weir crest g is the acceleration due to gravity Du is the upstream depth with respect to the crest |
C d is calculated using the equation:
|
where: L is the length of the horizontal section of the crest in the direction of flow |
C v is then calculated in terms of C dusing:
|
where: A is the cross sectional area of the approach channel below the water level |
When the modular ratio (the ratio above the crest level of downstream depth to calculated upstream depth) exceeds 66% the weir is deemed to be drowned and a nominal headloss is set.
See BS3680 (Part 4F) for more information.
Three flow regimes can be used to model for flow over a gated weir:
These are shown on the diagrams below:
Gated Weir Parameters
If the level on both sides is below the gate crest, then the following equation is used:
Equation |
Q = 0 |
m = Modular Limit
b = Breadth of sluice at control section (normal to the flow)
Ctc = Discharge coefficient for throat control
Cgt = Discharge coefficient for gate control
Crev = Discharge coefficient for reverse gate control
|
Flow is determined to be throat flow if |Qthroat| < |Qgate| and gate flow otherwise. Throat Flow:
Gate flow:
To determine whether flow is free flow or drowned flow:
|
Condition |
|
Equation |
as Equation (1) |
Condition |
|
Equation |
as Equation (1) |
Condition |
|
Equation |
as Equation (2) |
Condition |
|
Equation |
As Equation (2) |
Condition |
|
||
Equation |
If θ < 22
otherwise
where:
|
Condition |
|
||
Equation |
where all terms above are the same as defined for 'Free weir flow - reverse gate control', except fgate, which is as defined in equation (2) |
The equations and conditions are the same as for the forward flow combinations (described above) but with reverse flow (Q<0). Note that the orientation of the gate specified for reverse flow combinations is relative to the crest, not the flow direction, e.g. for 'Free weir flow - reverse gate, throat control, reverse flow', the position of the gate is not physically oriented the same as for 'Free weir flow - throat control'. For 'Free weir flow - throat control' and 'Free weir flow - forward gate control, reverse flow', the gates are in the same position, relative to the crest.
The equations used for the gated weir were derived from a physical model. The work is described in HR Wallingford Hydraulic Studies Report EX1296.